Can A Registered Independent Vote In The Primary Election In Florida

State poll opening and closing times

Early voting
Absentee/post-in voting
All-mail voting
Voter ID laws

Select a land from the menu below to learn more.

The policies governing voter participation are enacted and enforced primarily at the state level. These policies, which include voter identification requirements, early voting provisions, online voter registration systems, and more than, dictate the conditions under which American citizens cast their ballots in their corresponding states.

This article includes the post-obit information near voting policies in Florida:

Voter registration details, including deadlines and eligibility requirements.
In-person voting details, including identification requirements, poll times, and early voting provisions.
Absentee/mail service-in voting deadlines and rules.
Details well-nigh convicted felons' voting rights.
Contact information election agencies.
Summaries of noteworthy policy-related events.

See Ballot administration in Florida for more than additional data about election assistants in the state, including voter list maintenance policies, provisional ballot rules, and post-election auditing practices.

Voter registration

The table below displays voter registration data specific to Florida'south 2022 principal election.

Eligibility and registration details

To vote in Florida, one must exist at least 18 years of historic period, a citizen of the United States, and a legal resident of Florida and the canton in which he or she intends to vote.^[1] ^[2]

Voters may retrieve registration applications at the following locations:^[one]

Local elections offices
Public assistance agencies
Disability services agencies
Independent living centers
Armed services recruitment offices
Public libraries
Offices that issue commuter's licenses
Fishing and hunting license shops

A registration grade is also available online. The form can be printed and submitted via mail.^[2]

In-person voting

The table below displays in-person voting information specific to Florida's 2022 primary election.

Poll times

See also: Land poll opening and closing times

In Florida, all polls are open from 7:00 a.one thousand. to vii:00 p.thousand. An private who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote. Florida is split between Eastern and Primal time zones.^[iii]

Voter identification

Meet besides: Voter identification laws past state

Florida requires voters to present photo identification with a signature while voting.^[four] ^[5]

The post-obit list of accepted ID was current as of Nov 2019. Click here for the Florida Secretary of State'due south page on accustomed ID to ensure y'all take the most electric current data.

Florida commuter'due south license
Florida identification card issued by the Department of Highway Condom and Motor Vehicles
U.s. passport
Debit or credit carte
Military identification
Student identification
Retirement center identification
Neighborhood association identification
Public assistance identification
Veteran health identification bill of fare issued by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
License to carry a curtained weapon or firearm issued pursuant to s. 790.06
Employee identification carte du jour issued by any branch, department, agency, or entity of the federal government, the state, a county, or a municipality

A voter who presents an ID without a signature must testify a second class of identification that includes the voter's signature.

Early on voting

See as well: Early voting

Florida permits early voting. Learn more past visiting this website.

Absentee/postal service-in voting

Meet also: Absentee/mail-in voting

The table below displays absentee voting information specific to Florida's 2022 primary election.

All voters are eligible to vote past mail in Florida. There are no special eligibility requirements for voting by post.^[6]

To vote by mail, an application must exist received past ballot officials at least six days prior to the election. A returned ballot must then be received by election officials by seven:00 p.m. on Election Solar day.^[half-dozen]

Convicted felons' voting rights

Run into also: Voting rights for convicted felons

In Florida, individuals bedevilled of almost felony offenses have their voting rights restored upon completion of their unabridged sentence, including prison or jail, probation, and parole. Murder and felony sexual offenses permanently disqualify a person from voting.

On May 24, 2020, Judge Robert Hinkle, of the U.S. Commune Court for the Northern District of Florida, ruled that a state law requiring felons to pay all outstanding fines in order to be able to register to vote was unconstitutional. Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) indicated the state would appeal the decision.^[7] ^[8] ^[9]

Sitting en banc, the Eleventh Circuit took up the case and stayed the district court's gild, allowing the country to enforce the requirement pending its decision. The stay was appealed to the Supreme Court of the The states. On July 16, 2020, the Supreme Court declined to vacate the Eleventh Circuit'south stay, allowing for the connected enforcement of the law in question. Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Elena Kagan dissented.^[10]

On September eleven, 2020, the Eleventh Excursion upheld the challenged law by a vote of vi-4. The full text of the court's majority and dissenting opinions tin be accessed here.^[11] ^[12]

Voting rights for convicted felons vary from country to country. In the majority of states, bedevilled felons cannot vote while they are incarcerated just may regain the correct to vote upon release from prison or at some point thereafter.^[13] ^[fourteen]

Noteworthy events

2022: SB524

On April 25, 2022, Governor Ron DeSantis (R) signed SB524 into police force. SB524 made a number of changes to Florida's ballot laws, including, but not limited to, the following:^[15]

Established the Part of Election Crimes and Security, as a division of the Section of Land, "to aid the Secretary of State in completion of his or her existing duties related to investigation of ballot police force violations or election irregularities."
Required election supervisors to conduct registration listing maintenance programs at least once per twelvemonth (state law previously required such maintenance in one case in each odd-numbered year).
Barred the utilize of individual donations for any election-related expenses, including the costs of litigation.
Barred the use of ranked-option voting in whatsoever election.
Increased the annual cap on fines assessed confronting third-political party voter registration organizations that fail to deliver completed applications in a timely style from $1,000 to $fifty,000.
Established a penalty against tertiary-party voter registration organizations of $one,000 per application found to be altered by a person working on the organization's behalf.

On March 4, 2022, the Florida Senate approved the bill 24-fourteen, with 23 Republicans and i Democrat voting in favor and 13 Democrats and one Republican in opposition. The Florida House of Representatives followed conform on March 9, approval the bill 76-41, with 76 Republicans voting in favor and 41 Democrats in opposition.^[15]

2022: League of Women Voters five. Lee

On March 31, 2022, Judge Mark E. Walker, of the U.S. District Courtroom for the Northern District of Florida, struck down three state election laws: 1 regulating the availability and supervision of election drop boxes, one imposing delivery requirements on third-political party voter registration groups, and one barring certain activities at or near polling places and drop boxes. Walker also ordered that Florida submit any future changes to these policies for federal preclearance for a period of 10 years.

Background

On May half dozen, 2021, Gov Ron DeSantis (R) signed SB90, making a series of changes to Florida's election laws, including (but not limited to) the following:^[16]

Vote-by-mail service:
- Requiring that voters requesting mail-in ballots (in person, in writing, or by telephone) provide either their Florida identification card numbers or the terminal four digits of their Social Security numbers.
- Reducing the elapsing of a post-in election request class from two election cycles to one.
Drib boxes: Requiring that a secure drop box at a location other than the part of the county supervisor be open only during early voting hours, under the in-person monitoring of an employee of the supervisor'southward office.
Registration delivery: Requiring 3rd-party voter registration organizations (3PVROs) to deliver applications to the Partitioning of Elections or the Supervisor of Elections in the counties in which the applicants reside within 14 days of completing the applications (previously, 3PVROs could render completed applications to any Supervisor of Elections).
Solicitation: Barring anyone from "engaging in whatever activity with the intent to influence or effect of influencing a voter," either inside a polling place or within 150 feet of a driblet box or the entrance of a polling place (this prohibition can be construed to apply to "line warming" activities, such as giving out water, snacks, umbrellas, etc.).

The Florida Business firm of Representatives and the Florida State Senate approved the last version of SB90 by votes of 77-40 and 23-17, respectively, on Apr 29, 2021. In the House, the vote carve up along political party lines: all Republicans present voted in favor, and all Democrats nowadays voted against. In the Senate, the vote also split largely forth partisan lines, with one Republican (Sen. Jeff Brandes) joining the bedchamber's 16 Democrats in opposing the bill. SB90 took immediate issue.^[xvi]

Several groups, including the League of Women Voters of Florida and the Florida State Conference of Branches and Youth Units of the NAACP, filed iv separate lawsuits, alleging that the same provisions were intentionally racially discriminatory, in violation of the First, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments and the Voting Rights Act. The suits were consolidated at trial.

The district court'south ruling

Walker, a Barack Obama (D) appointee, noted that claims of racial discrimination must exist judged against the examination the U.Due south. Supreme Courtroom established in Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. The test incorporates the following factors:^[17]

The historical context.
"[T]he specific sequence of events leading up to" the challenged police's passage, including "procedural and noun departure" and "contemporary statements and actions of cardinal legislators."
The impact of the challenged police, including the"foreseeability of the disparate impact, noesis of that impact, and the availability of less discriminatory alternatives."

Walker ended that Florida's historical racial, political, and electoral contexts, as well as the specific sequence of events leading up to SB90's passage, supported the plaintiff's claims.^[17]

Walker then addressed the impact of SB90, dealing with each of the challenged provisions in turn:^[17]

Vote-by-post: Walker establish that the racial impact of both the request and identification provisions was "unclear."
Drop boxes: Walker found that SB90's drib-box provision "increases the time, transportation, and information costs of voting past drop box." Walker concluded that these costs would "fall more heavily on Black voters."
Registration delivery: Walker held that, because 3PVROs "overwhelmingly serve minority communities," the registration delivery provision "disproportionately harms Blackness and Latino voters."
Solicitation: Walker ended that SB90'due south solicitation provision "volition have a disparate impact on minority voters because minority voters are disproportionately likely to wait in line to vote, and because the provision discourages third parties from helping those waiting to vote."

Walker turned side by side to the question of whether these impacts were foreseeable and within the actual cognition of legislators. Walker concluded, "The evidence before this Court not only suggests that the Legislature had such knowledge, but also that it specifically sought it out." With respect to the availability of less discriminatory alternatives, Walker found that "less discriminatory alternatives to each challenged provision not simply were available merely were presented to and rejected by the Legislature."^[17]

Having considered impacts, Walker framed the question of intent every bit follows:^[17]

The main question … is whether the Legislature enacted SB90 purely to secure an electoral advantage for the Republican party without regard to whether it harmed minority voters, or whether SB90 was enacted, at least in role, to target minority voters in lodge to secure an electoral reward for the Republican Political party.^[18]

Walker ended that the plaintiffs failed to bear witness that the Legislature acted with discriminatory intent in adopting the vote-by-mail request and identification provisions. However, Walker found that the remaining challenged provisions "specifically target Black voters," in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. Walker permanently enjoined (i.east., barred) enforcement of these provisions.^[17]

Finally, Walker turned to the question of relief nether Department iii(c) of the Voting Rights Human action. Under Department iii(c), a court, upon finding that a political subdivision (east.1000., a land or a municipality) has committed intentional racial discrimination in voting, can mandate that the subdivision preclear changes to voting regulations with either the court or the U.S. Attorney General "for such a menstruation every bit [the court] may deem appropriate."^[17]

Walker concluded that relief nether Department three(c) was warranted in this case. Appropriately, Walker barred Florida officials from enacting any law or regulation governing 3PVROs, drop boxes, and line-warming activities without first immigration such changes with the court or the U.S. Chaser General for a period of 10 years.^[17]

Reactions

Cecile Scoon, president of the League of Women Voters of Florida said, "Senate Nib 90 was clearly an anti-voter measure out that raised barriers to voting for marginalized groups with specific impacts on elderly voters, voters with disabilities, students and communities of color. The League is gratified that once again the constitutional rights of all of Florida's voters take superseded partisan politics and that the targeted attack on Black voters volition be stopped."^[19]

In an interview, DeSantis described Walker'south ruling every bit "the judicial equivalent of pounding the table" and suggested that an appeal was in the works: "I think that that's going to be reversed on appeal. The only question is how chop-chop it gets reversed on appeal, but it'south not going to exist able to withstand appellate scrutiny."^[xx]

In a argument, Florida House Speaker Chris Sprowls (R) chosen Walker'due south ruling "an egregious abuse of his ability," adding: "The illogical leaps and unsupported inferences in Judge Walker's stance corporeality to a 288-page accusation of discriminatory intent based on express analysis of information he thinks the Legislature might take had, the uncritical and complete acceptance of the comments of Autonomous lawmakers, and a total disregard for other viewpoints."^[21]

Legal commentators discussed Walker's ruling within the context of the U.S. Supreme Courtroom'south 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, in which the Court held that preclearance mechanism contained in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. Joe Patrice, writing for Higher up the Law, said, "While [Shelby] didn't necessarily bar the door on a court reinstating preclearance requirements, no one idea to test the telescopic of the Court'southward animosity toward this provision until now." Rick Hasen, writing for Election Law Blog, said, "This is a huge deal, and the district court's analysis is probably right, only there is good reason to believe that this case could be reversed on appeal by the much more conservative 11th Circuit or the Supreme Court."^[22] ^[23]

The circuit court'southward ruling

On May 6, 2022, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the country's motion for a stay of the district courtroom'south ruling, allowing the disputed legal provisions to take effect and reversing the lower court's preclearance order. The panel comprised judges Kevin Newsom, Barbara Lagoa, and Andrew Brasher. In its unsigned order, the courtroom cited the Purcell principle, which holds that "federal commune courts commonly should not enjoin land ballot laws in the menstruation close to an ballot."^[24]

According for Purcell, we concur that the state is entitled to a stay of the district court's order enjoining the functioning of SB90'south Drop-Box, Registration-Delivery, and Solicitation Provisions and subjecting Florida to preclearance. The district court's decision regarding the legislature's intentional bigotry suffers from at least two flaws, either of which justifies a stay. And, although nosotros think it presents a closer question, nosotros hold that the district court's determination that the Solicitation Provision is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad is sufficiently vulnerable.^[xviii]

The excursion court'due south May 6 order did non represent a decision on the claim. Instead, the social club stayed the district court'due south gild awaiting resolution of the appeal to the excursion courtroom.^[24]

2021

On May 6, 2021, Governor Ron DeSantis (R) signed SB90, making the following modifications to Florida's ballot laws:^[16]

Prohibited the use of individual funds for election-related expenses.
Required that a voter requesting a postal service-in ballot (in person, in writing, or by telephone) provide either his or her Florida identification carte du jour number or the last four digits of his or her Social Security number.
Required that drop boxes for post-in ballots "be geographically located so every bit to provide all voters in the canton with an equal opportunity to cast a ballot, insofar every bit is practicable."
Provided that a secure drop box at a location other than the part of the county supervisor could only be open during early voting hours, under the in-person monitoring of an employee of the supervisor's function.
Provided that a secure drop box at a supervisor's office "be continually monitored in person past an employee of the supervisor's function when the drop box is accessible for deposit of ballots."
Established that "any person who distributes, orders, requests, collects, delivers, or otherwise physically possesses more than 2 vote-past-mail ballots per ballot in improver to his or her own ballot or a ballot belonging to an immediate family member, except as provided in ss. 101.6105-101.694, including supervised voting at assisted living facilities and nursing dwelling house facilities equally authorized nether s. 101.655, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree."

The House and Senate canonical the concluding version of SB90 by votes of 77-40 and 23-17, respectively, on April 29, 2021. In the Firm, the vote split forth party lines: all Republicans present voted in favor, and all Democrats nowadays voted against. In the Senate, the vote also split largely along partisan lines, with one Republican (Sen. Jeff Brandes) joining the chamber'southward sixteen Democrats in opposing the pecker. The full text of the enacted neb, which took immediate upshot, can be accessed here.^[16]

After DeSantis signed the nib into law, Firm Speaker Chris Sprowls (R) said, "The beak Governor DeSantis signed today will protect our election procedures and provide voters with conviction that our elections will remain attainable, efficient, and secure." Kara Gross, the legislative director and senior policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Matrimony of Florida , opposed the bill: "There was no problem in Florida. Everything worked as it should. The only reason they're doing this is to make it harder to vote."^[25] ^[26]

On May six, 2021, the League of Women Voters of Florida, the Blackness Voters Matters Fund, and the Florida Brotherhood for Retired Americans filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Commune Courtroom for the Northern Commune of Florida, alleging that SB90 violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.South. Constitution.^[27]

2018

Florida Subpoena four, Voting Rights Restoration for Felons Initiative

Meet also: Florida Amendment iv, Voting Rights Restoration for Felons Initiative (2018)

On November 6, 2018, Florida voters approved an initiated ramble subpoena automatically restoring the right to vote for individuals with certain felony convictions (except those convicted of murder or a felony sexual criminal offence) upon completion of their sentences, including prison, parole, and probation. The amendment was canonical by a margin of 64.55 percent to 34.45 percent. The amendment took result on Jan 8, 2019. Previously, felons in Florida could non automatically regain the right to vote; instead, a state board could restore voting rights on an individual basis.

Extended early on voting in counties afflicted by Hurricane Michael

On October eighteen, 2018, in response to Hurricane Michael, Gov. Rick Scott (R) issued an executive order granting eight counties the ability to extend their early voting periods and designate additional early on voting locations. Under Scott'south order, the affected counties— Bay, Calhoun, Franklin, Gadsden, Gulf, Jackson, Freedom and Washington—were besides authorized to evangelize mail ballots to addresses other than those for which voters were registered.^[28]

Early voting on higher campuses

On July 24, 2018, a federal guess barred enforcement of a Florida rule, established by the secretary of state in 2014, prohibiting the use of college campus sites equally early voting locations. Estimate Mark Due east. Walker, appointed past President Barack Obama (D) in 2012 to the Us District Court for the Northern Commune of Florida, wrote the following in his gild: "Simply put, Defendant's Opinion [i.e., Florida's rule barring early on voting on college campuses] reveals a stark pattern of discrimination. It is unexplainable on grounds other than age because information technology bears so heavily on younger voters than all other voters. Defendant'due south stated interests for the Opinion (post-obit land law, avoiding parking issues, and minimizing on-campus disruption) reek of pretext. While the Opinion does not identify higher students by name, its target population is unambiguous and its effects are lopsided. The Opinion is intentionally and facially discriminatory." Walker barred the secretary of land from enforcing the 2014 dominion, though he did not order election officials to designate early voting sites on college campuses, leaving such action to the discretion of local officials.^[29]

Patricia Brigham, president of the League of Women Voters of Florida, which was a plaintiff to the accommodate, praised Walker's decision: "This is truly a victory for the citizens of Florida, especially with so many young people motivated to vote. This is the correct decision, at the right time, for our autonomous process." In a statement, a spokesman for Governor Rick Scott (R) said, "Governor Scott is proud to have signed the largest expansion of early voting in the country'southward history. We will review this ruling." Scott's office did not indicate whether the state would entreatment Walker'southward conclusion.^[xxx]

2013

Senator Miguel Diaz de la Portilla (R), who sponsored a 2011 police force that reduced the number of early voting days in Florida, authored a nib designed to increase early on voting opportunities. The law granted counties an extra day for early voting earlier a general election and allowed them to continue polls open for 14 hours. In addition, the nib required all ballot supervisors to submit a report three months prior to a general election outlining preparations for that election.^[31]

In addition, Florida'due south election supervisors asked the legislature for the following changes with respect to early on voting:^[32]

Require that the legislature comply with the 75-word ballot summary requirement that is required for citizen-led ballot initiatives (lawmakers exempted themselves from that requirement years ago, and ordered the full text of several amendments to be on the Nov ballot, a leading contributor to long lines at polling places)
Require eight days of early on voting in primary and general elections "with the option for supervisors to provide boosted days not to exceed fourteen days" (in 2011, the legislature reduced the number of early on voting days from 14 to eight)
Requite ballot supervisors the elbowroom to select more early voting sites (at the time, early on voting sites were express to ballot offices, urban center halls, and libraries)

These changes were added and the bill was passed past the Florida State Legislature and signed past Governor Rick Scott (R).^[33]

Election agencies

Seal of the U.S. Election Assist Commission

Encounter too: State ballot agencies

Individuals seeking additional information most voting provisions in Florida can contact the following state and federal agencies.

Florida Partition of Elections

Room 316, R. A. Gray Building

500 South Bronough Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250

Phone: 850-245-6200

Email: DivElections@dos.state.fl.us

http://election.dos.country.fl.u.s.a./

U.Due south. Election Assistance Commission

1335 East West Highway, Suite 4300

Silver Spring, Maryland 20910

Telephone: 866-747-1471

Ballotpedia'southward ballot coverage

Click the tiles beneath to navigate to 2022 ballot coverage, or utilise the map beneath:

United states of america Senate Autonomous Party primaries, 2022
U.s. Firm Autonomous Political party primaries, 2022
Democratic Party gubernatorial primaries, 2022
Democratic Party Secretary of Country primaries, 2022
Autonomous Political party Chaser Full general primaries, 2022
State legislative Democratic primaries, 2022

United States Senate Republican Party primaries, 2022
United States House Republican Party primaries, 2022
Republican Political party gubernatorial primaries, 2022
Republican Party Secretary of State primaries, 2022
Republican Party Chaser Full general primaries, 2022
State legislative Republican primaries, 2022

Recent news

The link below is to the well-nigh recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Florida voting. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

External links

Official land election website

Footnotes

↑ ^1.0 ^ane.1 Florida Partitioning of Elections, "National Voter Registration Human activity (NVRA)," accessed October 6, 2019
↑ ^2.0 ^2.one Florida Partitioning of Elections, "Annals to Vote or Update your Information," accessed October six, 2019
↑ Florida Secretary of State, "FAQ - Voting," accessed October 17, 2019
↑ Florida Sectionalisation of Elections, "Election Day Voting," accessed September 29, 2019
↑ Florida Division of Elections, "Florida History: Voter ID at the Polls," accessed September 29, 2019
↑ ^vi.0 ^6.ane Florida Division of Elections, "Vote-by-Mail," accessed August 6, 2020
↑ Online Sunshine, "The 2019 Florida Statutes," accessed Oct 17, 2019
↑ Ballot Admission News, "Eleventh Circuit Agrees with U.S. District Courtroom that Ex-Felons Who Tin't Afford to Pay Restitution and Fines Must be Allowed to Annals to Vote," February 19, 2020
↑ Orlando Scout, "DeSantis to appeal Amendment 4 ruling that allows ex-felons to vote," May 26, 2020
↑ Supreme Court of the Us, "Raysor five. DeSantis: On Application to Vacate Stay," July sixteen, 2020
↑ Us Courtroom of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, "Jones five. DeSantis: Opinion," September 11, 2020
↑ The New York Times, "Ex-Felons in Florida Must Pay Fines Before Voting, Appeals Court Rules," September 11, 2020
↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "Felon Voting Rights," accessed July 15, 2014
↑ American Civil Liberties Marriage, "State Criminal Re-enfranchisement Laws," accessed September 13, 2019
↑ ^fifteen.0 ^15.1 The Florida Senate, "CS/CS/SB 524: Election Administration," accessed Apr 28, 2022
↑ ^16.0 ^16.ane ^16.2 ^{sixteen.three} The Florida Senate, "CS/CS/CS/SB 90: Elections," accessed May 25, 2021
↑ ^17.0 ^17.i ^17.2 ^17.3 ^17.4 ^17.five ^17.6 ^17.seven United states of america District Court for the Northern District of Florida, "League of Women Voters of Florida, Inc. v. Lee: Final Order Following Bench Trial," March 31, 2022
↑ ^18.0 ^18.i Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
↑ League of Women Voters of Florida, "LEAGUE VICTORY: Federal Court Strikes Down Florida Voter Suppression Law (Senate Neb 90)," March 31, 2022
↑ Governing, "Judge Overrules Almost of Florida's 2021 Election Law," March 31, 2022
↑ Twitter, "Chris Sprowls: three:05 PM · Mar 31, 2022," March 31, 2022
↑ Above the Law, "Commune Courts Telling Supreme Court To Buzz Off Right And Left," April four, 2022
↑ Election Constabulary Weblog, "Breaking: Federal Commune Court Strikes Downward Restrictive Florida Voting Rules, Imposes Requirement That Florida Submit Certain Voting Changes to Court for Preclearance Under Section 3(c) of Voting Rights Human action Upon Finding of Intentional Bigotry; Appeal Likely," March 31, 2022
↑ ^24.0 ^24.1 United states of america Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, "League of Women Voters of Florida, Inc. 5. Lee: Order of the Court," May 6, 2022
↑ Office of the Governor of Florida, "Governor Ron DeSantis Signs Bill to Safeguard the Sanctity of Florida Elections," May half-dozen, 2021
↑ The New York Times, "Florida Republicans Pass Voting Limits in Broad Elections Bill," April 29, 2021
↑ United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, "League of Women Voters of Florida, Inc. five. Lee: Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief," May 6, 2021
↑ Governing, "Early on Voting Restrictions Lifted in eight Florida Counties Hitting past Hurricane," Oct 22, 2018
↑ United states District Courtroom for the Northern District of Florida, "League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner: Gild Granting Plaintiffs' Move for Preliminary Injunction," July 24, 2018
↑ Tampa Bay Times, "Judge: Florida'south early voting-on-campus ban shows 'stark pattern of discrimination,'" July 24, 2018
↑ SunSentinel.com, "2011 elex police sponsor files beak to modify early voting," January seven, 2013
↑ Miami Herald, "Election supervisors want up to 14 early voting days," January 10, 2012
↑ Reuters, "Florida restores early voting days, moves back primary," May 3, 2013

v•e Election data

Resources	Sample Ballot Lookup • Elections calendar • State poll opening and closing times • Ballot admission for major and modest party candidates • Elections by state and year • State voter ID laws • Absentee voting • Early voting • Online voter registration • Ballot effect canvassing • Where practice I vote • List of absentee/mail-in ballot request websites by state • List of official voter registration websites by country

Elections by land	Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • S Carolina • Due south Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

2022 elections	U.S. Congress • Land executives • Country legislature • Statewide ballot measures • State judicial • Municipal government • Mayors • School boards • Local judicial • Local election measures • Recall

2021 elections	U.S. Congress special elections • Country executives • State legislature • Statewide ballot measures • State judicial • Municipal government • Mayors • Schoolhouse boards • Local judicial • Local ballot measures • Recall

2020 elections	U.S. President • U.Southward. Congress • Land executives • State legislature • Statewide ballot measures • State judicial • Municipal government • Mayors • Schoolhouse boards • Local judicial • Local ballot measures • Remember

2019 elections	U.Due south. Congress special elections • State executives • Land legislature • Statewide ballot measures • State judicial • Municipal government • School boards • Local judicial • Local election measures • Recall

2018 elections	U.Due south. Congress • Country executives • State legislature • Statewide ballot measures • State judicial • Municipal regime • School boards • Local judicial • Local election measures • Recall

How to vote in each state	Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • Northward Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Isle • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • Washington, D.C. • Westward Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

	five•e State of Florida Tallahassee (majuscule)
Elections	What's on my election? \| Elections in 2022 \| How to vote \| How to run for office \| Ballot measures
Government	Who represents me? \| U.S. President \| U.S. Congress \| Federal courts \| Land executives \| State legislature \| Country and local courts \| Counties \| Cities \| School districts \| Public policy